Recently, I’ve been receiving complaints from patients regarding some attending physician’s “quality” of service. Complaints like, “the doc saw me late already” or “my waiting time is far longer than my physician encounter time” or “this was not explained to me” or the difficulty of some patients (or relatives) to talk to their physicians. In most cases, the attending physician’s technical competence is unquestionable, but the patients or relatives sometimes felt they still didn’t receive adequate care or service from their physicians. What must they do?
I always tell these “complainants’ that any doctor-patient relationship is contractual by nature. Meaning both parties has to agree and deliver their end of the deal to consummate the “contract”. The contract is of course the delivery of health services required by the patient’s current health needs.(Read my perspective of this here.) This may sound simplistic but for purposes of discussion, this “understanding” of a contract should suffice. If one party, does not agree or adhere to the contract, then the relationship could be terminated after due process.
In non- emergent situation, and if the service is available, patients have the choice on who will be their doctor or what type of service they could avail. That by choosing or agreeing to be under the service of a particular physician, the patient also has the responsibility of paying the services of that physician. That is the contract, no matter how business like it sounds. In cases where one party felt that other party did not deliver the expected service , he or she may choose to end the contract after duly informing and after paying the services rendered by the physician. (By the way, the physician under certain circumstances and on valid grounds, may opt to terminate a patient-physician relationship too but let’s leave that discussion in my future posts.) In my practice, I always offer this option to all my patients even prior to our patient-physician relationship.
Problem comes in when patients just change physician services without adequately informing their previous and frequently, their succeeding physicians. Far worse is the situation wherein patients “leave” their previous physicians without paying their bills on the pretext of a “bad” service. This is not good practice either and probably will only harm patient’s reputation also. In the first place and except in emergency situations or some government health training facilities, the choice of any physician is really the patient’s responsibility. Health is the business not just of the physicians and institutions but of the patients as well. If you don’t know any of your physicians in the community, then you cannot blame someone else for receiving a bad service. Remember, that physician gave his or her professional service and in the context of a contractual form of relationship, that has to be duly paid even if you’ll change physicians.
So if you want to change your attending physicians for a valid reason, inform your physician of the transfer. Pay your end of the contract, meaning the services rendered. Cultivate the habit on talking to your doctors. Pour in your concerns on them and seek necessary answers to lingering questions. But don’t forget to inform the physician if there’s something good also about his or her service that you liked. I always believe no doctor would want any patient to feel bad about their brand of service. Just be honest. If those physicians do not change for whatever reason, that’s their catch. Remember that health community is far more sensitive than we thought on issues like this. These type of service screw ups always catches up someone else ears. If you don’t like them, then do not patronize them. That way, you won’t complain at the end of your contract. That simple.
Or is it? What do you think?
“The essential quality of the clinician is an interest
in humanity, for the secret of the care of the patient is in caring
for the patient.”– Francis Peabody Class of 1907, Harvard Medicine