Tag: privacy

  • For using Facebook and other social media platforms, how much of your personal privacy are you willing to give away?

    It blew right in our face.

    The “Facebook Scandal” (FB data breach with The Cambridge Analytica) shook many industries using  this social media platform to “influence” a particular interest.

    “We exploited Facebook to harvest millions of people’s profiles. And built models to exploit what we knew about them and target their inner demons…” Christopher Wylie, the whistleblower who worked with a Cambridge University academic to obtain these data using third party app, told the Observer.

    Mark Zuckerberg & Co built Facebook to fill its users’ need for socialising, online. We all knew however, that Facebook was also created to harvest data in the first place. This is in the fine print of FB’s terms of use you’ve agreed to, when you started using Facebook.   Although the company publicly admitted using data for their own regulated and targeted advertising algorithm alone,  it may have “unknowingly” provided  “limited data” to third party companies thru the various apps. Zuckerberg apologised for the “break of trust” given to them by their users because of this. What those “third party entities” do ( or did) with these data remains a mystery to the public.

    Remember how Target “snooped” on its customers and figured out a teen girls is pregnant before her father found out? By harvesting its customers’ shopping habits and using  predictive analysis, it was able to predict the most likely “next buys” of its customers and “structured” their stores to capture that buying intention. This pregnancy prediction model predicted with 87% accuracy that a lady would soon be delivering a baby if it buys vitamins, supplements, diapers or a blue rug!  We can only hypothesise about the staggering scenarios of “what ifs” if these breached data reached a not so well intentioned party. Elections, politics or buying habits are but to name three.

    In healthcare, privacy breaches are not only considered scandalous. It is  “deadly” as well for it may cost lives.

    To be fair to Facebook, healthcare (willingly or unwillingly) benefitted from some of the platforms “allure”. The relatively inexpensive, easy, accessible and wider user base are very good reasons for educating the masses about health  issues. It is also a very good alternative to ( or in fact dismantling) more traditional, expensive media platforms for getting across messages to a wide range of users.  There are probably thousands if not millions of patient support groups in FB.  Advocacy campaigns aimed at improving healthcare abound in this platform. There are also healthcare professionals who use FB as a listening and or speaking platforms for many well intentioned campaigns. In short, the healthcare industry through its stakeholders, are also benefitting from FB’s social media clout while knowingly giving away part of its privacy. Here’s where the conundrum begin and why this breach opened a  pandora’s box in healthcare.

    Imagine, if user profiles and data went into the hands of not so well intentioned healthcare industry player. What if this data is used “shape”, influence or manipulate minds to buy a particular product? Or tinkered, to accept or debunk certain healthcare issue without the benefit of validated research and recommended protocols by the medical community? What if the data are “manipulated’ to “influence” the medical community itself? This may or may not happen and regulations are something we- the healthcare stakeholders,  have to really look at in so many different ways.

    While social media regulation is still being debated, most rely on “self regulation” on what, when or how they do things on Facebook, to prevent data from falling into the “wrong hands”. Self regulation on social media  is though balancing act itself and remains a huge challenge to many of its users. #HealthXPh believe that educating the masses about health uses of these social media platforms’ plays a key role in this balancing act. This is what #HealthXPh is discussing (on Tweetchat) this Saturday March 24, 2018 9:00PM Manila Time .

    As a patient, healthcare professional, student, policy maker, or advocate, how much of your personal privacy are you willing to “give away” for using Facebook?

    • T1. Why would you or would you not deactivate your Facebook account?
      T2. For using FB, what kind “data” are you willing to give away and why?
      T3. What are your parameters for absolutely stopping Facebook use?

    We are inviting you to a lively discussion thru a twitter chat , this coming Saturday March 24, 2018 9:00PM Manila time. Join discussion!

  • The curious case of patient’s (or parts of them) photos on social media

    Years ago I amputated the right leg of my first ever explosives maimed patient. In my angst of the cruelty this man has suffered, I posted a photo of that amputated leg on social media.  I was careful not to put any identifying marks on the photo. I cannot even identify what extremity it was in that photo. I asked permission from the patient too although I doubt it if the person knew what social media is at that time. I was hoping that the brutality of the image would rally people against this type of cruelty. Desperate me maybe, but good intentions nonetheless.

    In less than 24 hours, I had more cursing people (at the cruelty) than I expected. I also got more than two inquiries asking who’s leg(?) it was in the photo. Great! I got the desired rallying effect I wanted.  And more. The inquiries made me pull out the photo less than 24 hours after posting.

    In today’s contracting, interconnected space, it is very difficult to hide an identity on the net.  It is even more difficult on social media. Posting photos on social media and hoping no one would identify it next to impossible Someone will eventually find out the identity of the picture, patient or whatever you posted on the net. Even corpses get identified.  From the story above, I realized its such a folly  to hide behind consents, disclaimers , non-identifying smokescreens and post on social media to further an agenda, no matter how good or noble you think it is.

    This story comes to mind again after seeing not a few unmarked, non identifiable, patient (or patient parts) on my social media feed. I am sad, well squirmish actually . But I’m not here to proselytize. I’m just saying that as a medical professional in areas where identities of your patient could spell out death to other people (sometimes yours), would you still post those pictures on social media? In an ever evolving interconnected and permanent internet, will consent and disclaimers  give us freedom to post pictures of patients on social media, no matter how unidentifiable that image is?

    Join us this Saturday January 17, 2015 9PM as we tackle yet, again patient confidentiality and privacy on social media.

    • T1.  Under what circumstances would you consider posting a photo of a patient on a social media acceptable? Explain.
    • T2. Under what circumstances would you allow a healthcare professional to post a picture of you on social media acceptable? Explain.
    • T3. How can we  hold healthcare professionals accountable for posting patient photos on social media?