systems Tag Archive

Deflection Bias in Practice: Between Constraint and Choice

Working inside healthcare constraints requires adaptation. But sometimes the harder question is recognizing when limitations shape not only what we can do, but also how we explain the decisions we make.

Working within healthcare constraints requires adaptation. But sometimes the harder question is recognizing when adaptation becomes explanation — and when explanation quietly becomes justification.

We work in systems where ideal diagnostics are not always available.

That is not new.

It is the reality many of us have adapted to.

Continue Reading

By

Read More

Practical Digital Transformation in Resource-Limited Healthcare Settings

Digital transformation in healthcare rarely begins with the technology itself. In resource-limited settings, meaningful change often starts by understanding the work people already do and the problems they are already trying to solve.

After more than twenty years practicing within the Philippine healthcare system, I have become less interested in technology itself and more interested in what allows useful changes to survive.

Healthcare has no shortage of new tools.

The harder question is whether those tools actually improve the work of the people taking care of patients.

Continue Reading

By

Read More

Leading Change When Change Isn’t the Norm

Healthcare change does not always begin with large reforms. Sometimes it starts when someone close to a problem becomes curious enough to understand it better and improve the part of the system within reach.

“If there is one thing that will definitely change about our complex healthcare system, practices and behaviors are rarely among the easiest.”

One question I often hear whenever I talk about creating a learning organization in healthcare is:

“I like these ideas about change, but what can I do if many people in my organization do not embrace that same philosophy?”

I usually think about stories like Rina’s.

Rina was a new resident physician helping manage patients with more senior residents in one healthcare institution.

Still learning the details of cast application and monitoring, she was asked by her senior resident to apply a cast to a young patient who sustained a forearm fracture after a fall.

Before leaving to respond to an emergency call, her senior advised her to review proper cast application and monitoring techniques.

Rina proceeded with what she knew — textbook knowledge, guidance from seniors, and the limited experience of seeing the procedure done before.

She finished the cast and sent the patient home after giving instructions about monitoring.

Less than two hours later, the patient returned to the emergency room crying in pain.

“My arm hurts. It feels like it is being squeezed and twisted.”

Suspecting that the cast was too tight, Rina immediately opened the cast.

The patient felt relief.

But Rina was shaken.

She tried to do what was right for the patient and still ended up facing a possible complication.


During a mentoring discussion with an attending consultant, Rina brought up her experience.

“Is there a certain level of competency a resident needs before being allowed to apply casts and prevent these complications?”

The consultant answered:

“If you mean how many times a resident needs to apply a cast before becoming competent, there is no exact number.”

Complications may be uncommon, but prevention depends on something harder to measure — judgment, awareness, and knowing which signs should make you concerned.


Rina started asking more questions.

She talked to ward nurses about how they monitored patients with casts.

One nurse explained that they documented observations but were not always certain which findings required immediate referral.

She talked to patients and their families.

One parent understood that increasing pain was a warning sign but explained that living far from the hospital made returning quickly difficult.

A simple complication was no longer just about cast technique.

It involved training, communication, systems, access, and patient education.


Rina eventually started studying ways to improve cast monitoring and prevent similar problems.

She worried that because these complications were considered uncommon, her experience and research might eventually become another story people talked about but never acted on.

I smiled.

“Just keep doing what you are doing,” I told her.

“Maybe your work will change policies and practices. Maybe it won’t. But at least you will have improved something for yourself, your patients, and then some.”


That is usually my answer when people ask:

“What can I do when my organization does not embrace change?”

Do what Rina did.

Start with a problem close enough for you to understand.

Ask the people involved.

Study what is actually happening.

Try to make that part of the system better.

Maybe it changes a larger system, maybe it does not. But it changes how we understand and care for the people in front of us.

Sometimes, that is where change starts — with someone deciding a problem is worth understanding better.

By

Read More

The Pursuit of Happiness in the Healthcare Workplace

Healthcare burnout is often discussed as a systems problem. But behind the policies and solutions is a quieter question many healthcare workers face every day — how do we continue finding meaning while working inside systems that are still trying to change?

“Mam, where’s our patient?”

The operating room nurse calmly explained the reasons why our patient was not yet on the table as scheduled.

I could feel the frustration building.

“Excuse me,” I said.

I quietly walked back to the empty OR dressing room. I threw a one-two punch and a high kick into the air, closed my eyes, took a deep breath, and sat there for a moment.

Then I grabbed my hospital coat.

I went to the patient’s room, talked with the patient, and tried to fix whatever I could so the procedure could still happen later.

I did all of that with the warmest smile I could manage.

Inside, I was looking for answers.

Am I still happy doing this despite everything that comes with it?


Stories about burnout, declining mental health, and dissatisfaction among healthcare workers have become increasingly common.

Burnout is not simply being tired after a difficult day. The World Health Organization describes it as a consequence of chronic workplace stress that has not been successfully managed — involving exhaustion, increasing distance or cynicism toward work, and a reduced sense of professional effectiveness.

For many healthcare workers, this definition feels familiar.

But burnout is rarely just an individual problem.

Healthcare workers do not practice in isolation. We work inside complicated systems — hospitals, policies, workflows, financial limitations, administrative demands, and human expectations.

The system we work in eventually affects how we work, how we think, and sometimes how we feel about the profession


I am not ignoring the larger problems affecting healthcare.

Many causes of burnout are structural. Healthcare needs systemic solutions, and we probably needed many of those solutions years ago.

But while organizations and leaders work toward those changes, healthcare workers still return to the wards, clinics, operating rooms, and emergency departments every day.

We are left with a more immediate question:

How do we continue doing meaningful work inside imperfect systems?

A colleague once asked me:

“How do you find happiness in this kind of workplace?”

It sounded cynical.

But hidden inside that frustration was still a search for something better.


Finding happiness at work is not about ignoring the problems around us. It is about finding enough meaning to continue working while trying to improve them.

Sometimes it means noticing the few moments that remind us why we still show up.

A patient conversation.

A difficult case completed.

A colleague who helps.

A moment where the work still feels connected to why we started.


System changes matter. Healthcare leaders need to address the conditions that make good people exhausted, disconnected, and eventually leave.

But until those changes reach the people doing the work every day, many healthcare professionals continue searching for ways to protect meaning inside the profession they chose.

Maybe that search itself is important.

Because the people trying to improve healthcare are also the same people trying to survive working within it.

References:

  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2019. Taking Action Against Clinician Burnout: A Systems Approach to Professional Well-Being. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25521.
  • Shanafelt TD , Balch CM ,  Bechamps GJ , et al . 2009. Burnout and career satisfaction among American surgeons. ASurg 2009;250:107 15. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ac4dfd
  • Rosales, Rheajane & Labrague, Leodoro & Rosales, Gilbey. (2013). Nurses’ Job satisfaction and Burnout: Is there a Correction?. International Journal of Advanced Nursing Studies. 2. 10.14419/ijans.v2i1.583.
  • Jabonete, Fritz Gerald & Dayrit, Aubrey. (2018). Reported Work-related Stressors among Staff Nurses in Metro Manila, Philippines.
  • #HCLDR. (2019, December 5). Reconnecting To Joy in Work [Blog post]. Retrieved from <https://hcldr.wordpress.com/2019/12/05/reconecting-to-joy-in-work/>
  • Credit: Image by Halcyon Marine Healthcare Systems from Pixabay

By

Read More

What Is Disruptive Technology?

Disruptive technologies may offer new and cost-effective ways of addressing healthcare problems in the Philippines—problems we have often blamed on lack of resources.

“A disruptive technology is an innovation providing a product or service that is so compelling that everyone rapidly abandons their current way of doing things and flocks to what is new.”

— Hank C. Lucas Jr., University of Maryland

In an archipelagic country like the Philippines, with a healthcare delivery system lagging behind some of its neighbours, disruptive technologies offer us new ways of looking at old problems. They may also offer cost-effective solutions to healthcare problems that have been with us for decades—problems we often blame on lack of resources.

Here are some innovations in healthcare that might already be knocking at our doors. The infographic below is from Bertalan Meskó, the Medical Futurist.

[Retain original infographic here]

Here are my top three disruptive innovations that might change the way we handle healthcare in the Philippines.

1. Internet and social media

The information explosion brought by the internet has had a tremendous effect on healthcare. Access to medical information and collaborative work has never been easier or faster.

Social media, on the other hand, has given us another tool for engaging patients and encouraging a more participatory type of medicine.

2. Massive Open Online Courses

Massive Open Online Courses, or MOOCs, have changed access to learning and education. Healthcare education is already beginning to explore this innovation, although perhaps more slowly here in the Philippines.

We definitely still need formal, face-to-face, institution-based medical education. But other areas of healthcare learning—healthcare systems and models not usually taught in medical school, for example—can also be learned through MOOCs.

MOOCs may help reduce the prohibitive cost of further education and address some of the “lack of resources” for learning that we often complain about in the academe.

3. Telemedicine

Don’t have a healthcare professional in your location? Perhaps you can video chat with a physician elsewhere.

Don’t have a colleague nearby to refer to or work with in managing a patient? Perhaps you can teleconference with another doctor.

The potential impact of this innovation on healthcare is enormous. In a country where healthcare delivery is greatly affected by geography, limited human resources, and prohibitive costs, telemedicine offers another way of addressing healthcare problems that remains underused.

Of course, there are other disruptive innovations I could add to the list. Some have not yet “landed” on our shores, while others are probably still experimental in their use for healthcare in the Philippines.

Three-dimensional printing and bioprinting, for example, are being explored for tissue replication. In orthopedics, 3D printing technologies are also being studied for applications involving bone and cartilage.

So, which of these disruptive technologies do you think might help us solve some of our healthcare problems in the Philippines?

By

Read More

× Close